Vienna Circle and Logical Analysis of Relativity Theory
H. Andr\'eka, J. X. Madar\'asz, I. N\'emeti, P. N\'emeti and, G. Sz\'ekely

TL;DR
This paper constructs a hierarchy of relativity theories using first-order logic to enhance clarity, understandability, and modularity, demonstrating the Vienna Circle's logical approach to scientific theories.
Contribution
It develops a logical, axiomatic framework for relativity theory based on the Vienna Circle's principles, emphasizing transparency and logical structure.
Findings
Relativity theory can be formalized with simple, clear axioms.
Logical analysis reveals which axioms are essential for predictions.
The approach improves understanding and teaching of relativity.
Abstract
In this paper we present some of our school's results in the area of building up relativity theory (RT) as a hierarchy of theories in the sense of logic. We use plain first-order logic (FOL) as in the foundation of mathematics (FOM) and we build on experience gained in FOM. The main aims of our school are the following: We want to base the theory on simple, unambiguous axioms with clear meanings. It should be absolutely understandable for any reader what the axioms say and the reader can decide about each axiom whether he likes it. The theory should be built up from these axioms in a straightforward, logical manner. We want to provide an analysis of the logical structure of the theory. We investigate which axioms are needed for which predictions of RT. We want to make RT more transparent logically, easier to understand, easier to change, modular, and easier to teach. We want to obtain…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
