Lepton Number Violation in TeV Scale See-Saw Extensions of the Standard Model
A. Ibarra, E. Molinaro, S.T. Petcov

TL;DR
This paper revisits constraints on TeV-scale type I see-saw models, showing that lepton number violation signals are difficult to observe at current colliders due to strong parameter constraints, and discusses implications of observing heavy Majorana neutrinos.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of low-energy constraints on TeV-scale see-saw models and discusses the conditions under which heavy neutrinos could exhibit observable lepton number violation.
Findings
Lepton number violation signals are suppressed at colliders due to parameter constraints.
Heavy Majorana neutrinos may behave as pseudo-Dirac fermions in these models.
Observation of Majorana effects would suggest additional couplings or alternative neutrino mass mechanisms.
Abstract
The low-energy neutrino physics constraints on the TeV scale type I see-saw scenarios of neutrino mass generation are revisited. It is shown that lepton charge (L) violation, associated to the production and decays of heavy Majorana neutrinos N_{j} having masses in the range of M_j \sim (100 \div 1000) GeV and present in such scenarios, is hardly to be observed at ongoing and future particle accelerator experiments, LHC included, because of very strong constraints on the parameters and couplings responsible for the corresponding |\Delta L| = 2 processes. If the heavy Majorana neutrinos N_j are observed and they are associated only with the type I mechanism, they will behave effectively like pseudo-Dirac fermions. Conversely, the observation of effects proving the Majorana nature of N_j would imply that these heavy neutrinos have additional relatively strong couplings to the Standard…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
