The influence of binarity on dust obscuration events in the planetary nebula M 2-29 and its analogues
B. Miszalski, J. Miko{\l}ajewska, J. K\"oppen, T. Rauch, A. Acker, M., Cohen, D. J. Frew, A. F. J. Moffat, Q. A. Parker, A. F. Jones, A. Udalski

TL;DR
This study investigates how binarity influences dust obscuration events in the planetary nebula M 2-29, analyzing its lightcurve, spectral data, and potential binary companions to understand dust formation mechanisms.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of dust obscuration in M 2-29, challenging previous binary hypotheses and clarifying its Galactic Bulge classification.
Findings
No direct evidence of binarity in M 2-29 from lightcurve or spectroscopy.
Dust forms at over 70 AU, inconsistent with binary-triggered dust formation.
M 2-29 is confirmed as a Galactic Bulge planetary nebula.
Abstract
The central star of the planetary nebula (CSPN) M 2-29 shows an extraordinary R Coronae Borealis-like fading event in its optical lightcurve. The only other CSPN to show these events are CPD-568032 (Hen 3-1333) and V651 Mon (NGC 2346). Dust cloud formation in the line of sight appears responsible but the exact triggering mechanism is not well understood. Understanding how planetary nebulae (PNe) trigger dust obscuration events may help understand the same process in a wide range of objects including Population-I WC9 stars, symbiotic stars and perhaps Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) stars with long secondary periods (LSPs). A binary scenario involving an eccentric, wide companion that triggers dust formation via interaction at periastron is a potential explanation that has been suggested for LSP variables. Model fits to the lightcurves of CPD-568032 and M 2-29 show the dust forms in excess…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
