Correlations in Hawking radiation and the infall problem
Samir D. Mathur, Christopher J. Plumberg

TL;DR
This paper investigates the entanglement structure of Hawking radiation, demonstrating that small quantum corrections are insufficient to resolve the information paradox, and explores models where entanglement dynamics align with theoretical bounds.
Contribution
It provides numerical analysis of entanglement growth under small corrections and proposes a fuzzball-based complementarity model to address the black hole information problem.
Findings
Entanglement monotonically increases with small corrections, consistent with theoretical inequalities.
A 'burning paper' model shows entanglement rises then falls, matching Page's predictions.
Fuzzball microstates suggest a complementarity approach, modifying low energy evolution to preserve unitarity.
Abstract
It is sometimes believed that small quantum gravity effects can encode information as `delicate correlations' in Hawking radiation, thus saving unitarity while maintaining a semiclassical horizon. A recently derived inequality showed that this belief is incorrect: one must have order unity corrections to low energy evolution at the horizon (i.e. fuzzballs) to remove entanglement between radiation and the hole. In this paper we take several models of `small corrections' and compute the entanglement entropy numerically; in each case this entanglement is seen to monotonically grow, in agreement with the general inequality. We also construct a model of `burning paper', where the entanglement is found to rise and then return to zero, in agreement with the general arguments of Page. We then note that the fuzzball structure of string microstates offers a version of `complementarity'. Low…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
