Can the soft X-ray opacity towards high redshift sources probe the missing baryons?
Ehud Behar, Shlomo Dado, Arnon Dar, Ari laor

TL;DR
This study investigates whether soft X-ray absorption towards high-redshift sources can reveal the missing baryons in the universe, by analyzing GRB and quasar spectra to test the diffuse IGM absorption hypothesis.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence supporting the diffuse IGM as the main absorber and discusses the challenges posed by quasar absorption data to this hypothesis.
Findings
Average optical depth at z > 2 is constant, supporting IGM absorption.
Quasar data at high z are consistent with GRB results, but low-z quasars show less absorption.
Lack of quasar absorption challenges the IGM absorption interpretation.
Abstract
Observations with the Swift satellite of X-ray afterglows of more than a hundred gamma ray bursts (GRBs) with known redshift reveal ubiquitous soft X-ray absorption. The directly measured optical depth \tau at a given observed energy is found to be constant on average at redshift z > 2, i.e., <\tau (0.5 keV) >_{z > 2} = 0.40+/- 0.02. Such an asymptotic optical depth is expected if the foreground diffuse intergalactic medium (IGM) dominates the absorption effect, and if the metallicity of the diffuse IGM reaches ~ 0.2 - 0.4 solar at z = 0. To further test the IGM absorption hypothesis, we analyze the 12 highest S/N (> 5000 photon) z > 2 quasar spectra from the XMM-Newton archive, which are all extremely radio loud (RLQs). The quasar optical depths are found to be consistent with the mean GRB value. The four lowest-z quasars (2 < z < 2.5), however, do not show significant absorption. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
