Little change in the sizes of the most massive galaxies since z = 1

TL;DR

This study finds that the sizes of brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) have changed little since redshift z=1, challenging models that predict significant late-time size growth through mergers.

Contribution

First estimates of BCG sizes at z=1 from HST imaging show minimal evolution, suggesting mergers are not the dominant process in their late-time growth.

Findings

BCG sizes at z=1 are ~30% smaller than at z=0.25

Little to no size evolution observed between z=0.8 and z=1

Results imply mergers are not the main driver of BCG growth in recent cosmic history

Abstract

Recent reports suggest that elliptical galaxies have increased their size dramatically over the last ~8 Gyr. This result points to a major re-think of the processes dominating the latetime evolution of galaxies. In this paper we present the first estimates for the scale sizes of brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) in the redshift range 0.8 < z < 1.3 from an analysis of deep Hubble Space Telescope imaging, comparing to a well matched local sample taken from the Local Cluster Substructure Survey at z ~ 0.2. For a small sample of 5 high redshift BCGs we measure half-light radii ranging from 14 - 53 kpc using de Vaucuoleurs profile fits, with an average determined from stacking of 32.1 \pm 2.5 kpc compared to a value 43.2 \pm 1.0 kpc for the low redshift comparison sample. This implies that the scale sizes of BCGs at z = 1 are ~ 30% smaller than at z = 0.25. Analyses comparing either Sersic or Petrosian radii also indicate little or no evolution between the two samples. The detection of only modest evolution at most out to z = 1 argues against BCGs having undergone the large increase in size reported for massive galaxies since z = 2 and in fact the scale-size evolution of BCGs appears closer to that reported for radio galaxies over a similar epoch. We conclude that this lack of size evolution, particularly when coupled with recent results on the lack of BCG stellar mass evolution, demonstrates that major merging is not an important process in the late time evolution of these systems. The homogeneity and maturity of BCGs at z = 1 continues to challenge galaxy evolution models.