Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph survey of young stars in the Chamaeleon I star-forming region
P. Manoj, K. H. Kim, E. Furlan, M. K. McClure, K. L. Luhman, D. M., Watson, C. Espaillat, N. Calvet, J. R. Najita, P. D'Alessio, L. Adame, B. A., Sargent, W. J. Forrest, C. Bohac, J. D. Green, L. A. Arnold

TL;DR
This study uses Spitzer IRS spectra to analyze the structure, dust processing, and evolution of protoplanetary disks around young stars in the Chamaeleon I region, revealing dust settling, grain growth, and disk gaps.
Contribution
It provides detailed spectral analysis of 82 young stars, identifying disk structures and dust properties, and compares disk evolution across star-forming regions.
Findings
Evidence for substantial dust settling in most disks
Identification of disks with holes or gaps, including transitional candidates
Correlation between crystalline dust content in different disk regions
Abstract
We present 5 to 36 micron mid-infrared spectra of 82 young stars in the ~2 Myr old Chamaeleon I star-forming region, obtained with the Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph (IRS). We have classified these objects into various evolutionary classes based on their spectral energy distributions and the spectral features seen in the IRS spectra. We have analyzed the mid-IR spectra of Class II objects in Chamaeleon I in detail, in order to study the vertical and radial structure of the protoplanetary disks surrounding these stars. We find evidence for substantial dust settling in most protoplanetary disks in Chamaeleon I. We have identified several disks with altered radial structures in Chamaeleon I, among them transitional disk candidates which have holes or gaps in their disks. Analysis of the silicate emission features in the IRS spectra of Class II objects in Chamaeleon I shows that the dust…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
