Reconciling Compressive Sampling Systems for Spectrally-sparse Continuous-time Signals
Michael A. Lexa, Mike E. Davies, and John S. Thompson

TL;DR
This paper compares two compressed sensing systems for spectrally-sparse signals, analyzing their similarities, differences, and robustness, and introduces a new system leveraging block sparsity for improved sampling and reconstruction.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of the RD and MWC systems, highlighting their fundamental differences and introducing a novel acquisition system based on block sparsity.
Findings
RD and MWC are based on random filtering but use different sampling functions.
Both systems' sensitivities to sparse signal models are analyzed.
A new system for block-sparse signals is proposed, leveraging 'block convolution'.
Abstract
The Random Demodulator (RD) and the Modulated Wideband Converter (MWC) are two recently proposed compressed sensing (CS) techniques for the acquisition of continuous-time spectrally-sparse signals. They extend the standard CS paradigm from sampling discrete, finite dimensional signals to sampling continuous and possibly infinite dimensional ones, and thus establish the ability to capture these signals at sub-Nyquist sampling rates. The RD and the MWC have remarkably similar structures (similar block diagrams), but their reconstruction algorithms and signal models strongly differ. To date, few results exist that compare these systems, and owing to the potential impacts they could have on spectral estimation in applications like electromagnetic scanning and cognitive radio, we more fully investigate their relationship in this paper. We show that the RD and the MWC are both based on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
