
TL;DR
This paper analyzes previous claims about gauging electromagnetic duality, clarifying why certain approaches preserve gauge invariance while others do not, ultimately confirming the impossibility of gauging duality with conventional methods.
Contribution
It clarifies the differences between approaches to gauging electromagnetic duality and demonstrates the limitations of the Malik-Pradhan method in preserving gauge invariance.
Findings
Malik-Pradhan method does not preserve Maxwell gauge invariance
Bunster, Henneaux, and Deser focus on gauge-invariant generalizations
Gauging electromagnetic duality with conventional schemes is not feasible
Abstract
Bunster and Henneaux and, separately, Deser have very recently considered the possibility of gauging the usual electromagnetic duality of Maxwell equations. By using off-shell manipulations in the context of the Principle of least action, they conclude that this is not possible, at least with the conventional compensating gauge fields scheme. Such a conclusion contradicts, however, an old result of Malik and Pradhan, who showed that it is indeed possible to introduce an extra abelian gauge field directly in the vacuum Maxwell equations in order to render them covariant under local duality transformations. Since it is well known that the equations of motion can, in general, admit more symmetries than the associate Lagrangian, this would not be a paradoxal result, in principle. Here, we revisit these works and identify the source of the different conclusions. We show that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
