Pulsar Timing Sensitivity to Very-Low-Frequency Gravitational Waves
Fredrick A. Jenet, J.W. Armstrong, Massimo Tinto

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the sensitivity of pulsar timing to very-low-frequency gravitational waves, identifying key noise sources and the conditions needed for potential detection of a stochastic GW background.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the fundamental noise limits in pulsar timing for detecting nanohertz GWs and discusses the technological improvements required for future detections.
Findings
Sensitivity limited by interstellar plasma turbulence and white timing noise.
Achieving current terrestrial time standards could enable detection at h_rms ~2×10^{-16}.
Detection of a supermassive black hole binary background requires enhanced pulsar array processing.
Abstract
At nanohertz frequencies gravitational waves (GWs) cause variations in time-of-arrival of pulsar signals potentially measurable via precision timing observations. Here we compute very-low-frequency GW sensitivity constrained by instrumental, propagation, and other noises fundamentally limiting pulsar timing observations. Reaching expected GW signal strengths will require estimation and removal of 99% of time-of-arrival fluctuations caused by typical interstellar plasma turbulence and a reduction of white rms timing noise to 100 nsec or less. If these were achieved, single-pulsar signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) = 1 sensitivity is then limited by the best current terrestrial time standards at 2 [f/(1 cycle/year)] for Hz, where f is Fourier frequency and a bandwidth of 1 cycle/(10 years) is assumed. This sensitivity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
