A problem of Klee on inner section functions of convex bodies
Richard J. Gardner, Dmitri Ryabogin, Vladyslav Yaskin, and Artem, Zvavitch

TL;DR
This paper constructs examples of convex bodies that are not uniquely determined by their inner section functions, answering a longstanding question negatively and showing that different bodies can share the same maximal section areas.
Contribution
It provides explicit constructions of convex bodies with identical inner section functions, including non-symmetric and symmetric bodies, disproving the uniqueness conjecture.
Findings
Constructed pairs of convex bodies with identical inner section functions
Bodies can be arbitrarily close to the unit ball
Counterexamples include both symmetric and non-symmetric bodies
Abstract
In 1969, Vic Klee asked whether a convex body is uniquely determined (up to translation and reflection in the origin) by its inner section function, the function giving for each direction the maximal area of sections of the body by hyperplanes orthogonal to that direction. We answer this question in the negative by constructing two infinitely smooth convex bodies of revolution about the -axis in , , one origin symmetric and the other not centrally symmetric, with the same inner section function. Moreover, the pair of bodies can be arbitrarily close to the unit ball.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPoint processes and geometric inequalities · Diffusion and Search Dynamics
