Modeling the iron oxides and oxyhydroxides for the prediction of environmentally sensitive phase transformations

TL;DR

This study compares computational methods for modeling iron oxides and oxyhydroxides, successfully predicting phase stability and magnetic properties, and constructs a first-principles phase diagram under varying chemical conditions.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive comparison of plane-wave and localized basis set methods for modeling complex iron oxide phases and presents the first phase diagram derived entirely from first-principles calculations.

Findings

Both basis sets accurately reproduce stability and magnetic order.

PW basis set is more suitable for this application.

Constructed the first phase diagram from first-principles data.

Abstract

Iron oxides and oxyhydroxides are challenging to model computationally as competing phases may differ in formation energies by only several kJ/mol, they undergo magnetization transitions with temperature, their structures may contain partially occupied sites or long-range ordering of vacancies, and some loose structures require proper description of weak interactions such as hydrogen bonding and dispersive forces. If structures and transformations are to be reliably predicted under different chemical conditions, each of these challenges must be overcome simultaneously, while preserving a high level of numerical accuracy and physical sophistication. Here we present comparative studies of structure, magnetization, and elasticity properties of iron oxides and oxyhydroxides using density functional theory calculations with plane-wave and locally-confined-atomic-orbital basis sets, which are implemented in VASP and SIESTA packages, respectively. We have selected hematite, maghemite, goethite, lepidocrocite, and magnetite as model systems from a total of 13 known iron oxides and oxyhydroxides; and use same convergence criteria and almost equivalent settings in order to make consistent comparisons. Our results show both basis sets can reproduce the energetic stability and magnetic ordering, and are in agreement with experimental observations. There are advantages to choosing one basis set over the other, depending on the intended focus. In our case, we find the method using PW basis set most appropriate, and combine our results to construct the first phase diagram of iron oxides and oxyhydroxides in the space of competing chemical potentials, generated entirely from first principles