An Euler characteristic proof that 4-prismatoids have width at most 4
Tamon Stephen, Hugh Thomas

TL;DR
This paper proves that 4-prismatoids cannot serve as counterexamples to the Hirsch conjecture by showing they have width at most 4, using an Euler characteristic argument.
Contribution
It provides a novel Euler characteristic proof that 4-prismatoids have bounded width, ruling out their use as counterexamples in dimension four.
Findings
4-prismatoids have width at most 4
No 4-dimensional analogue of 5-prismatoids exists as a counterexample
Euler characteristic methods are effective in this geometric context
Abstract
We show that there is no 4-dimensional analogue of the 5-prismatoids used in Santos' recent counterexample to the Hirsch conjecture.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics and Applications · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Advanced Topics in Algebra
