Finite Sholander Trees, Trees, and their Betweenness
Va\v{s}ek Chv\'atal, Dieter Rautenbach, and Philipp Matthias Sch\"afer

TL;DR
This paper proves a key claim about representing segments with trees, characterizes the interval function of a tree, and simplifies existing characterizations of tree betweenness relations.
Contribution
It provides a proof of Sholander's claim on segment representation and streamlines Burigana's characterization of tree betweenness relations.
Findings
Proof of Sholander's claim on segment representation
Characterization of the interval function of a tree
Simplified proof of Burigana's characterization
Abstract
We provide a proof of Sholander's claim (Trees, lattices, order, and betweenness, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 3, 369-381 (1952)) concerning the representability of collections of so-called segments by trees, which yields a characterization of the interval function of a tree. Furthermore, we streamline Burigana's characterization (Tree representations of betweenness relations defined by intersection and inclusion, Mathematics and Social Sciences 185, 5-36 (2009)) of tree betweenness and provide a relatively short proof.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopological and Geometric Data Analysis · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Advanced Graph Theory Research
