New Constraints on Mass-Dependent Disruption of Star Clusters in M51
Rupali Chandar (1), Bradley C. Whitmore (2), Daniela Calzetti (3),, Daiana Di Nino (4), Robert C. Kennicutt (5), Michael Regan (2), and Eva, Schinnerer (6) ((1) The University of Toledo, (2) Space Telescope Science, Institute, (3) University of Massachusetts

TL;DR
This study uses Hubble Space Telescope images to analyze star clusters in M51, finding a power-law mass function with no evidence of mass-dependent disruption or an upper mass limit, challenging previous assumptions.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed mass function of intermediate age clusters in M51 extending to lower masses and shows no signs of mass-dependent disruption or upper mass limits.
Findings
Mass function follows a power law with beta=-2.1.
No evidence for curvature or mass-dependent disruption.
Clusters in different spiral features formed at different times.
Abstract
We use UBVI,Ha images of the Whirlpool galaxy, M51, taken with the ACS and WFPC2 cameras on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) to select star clusters, and to estimate their masses and ages by comparing their observed colors with predictions from population synthesis models. We construct the mass function of intermediate age (1-4x10^8 yr) clusters, and find that it is well described by a power law, psi(M) propto M^beta, with beta=-2.1 +/- 0.2, for clusters more massive than approximately 6x10^3 Msun. This extends the mass function of intermediate age clusters in M51 to masses lower by nearly a factor of five over previous determinations. The mass function does not show evidence for curvature at either the high or low mass end. This shape indicates that there is no evidence for the earlier disruption of lower mass clusters compared with their higher mass counterparts (i.e., no…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
