The Reactor Antineutrino Anomaly
G. Mention, M. Fechner, Th. Lasserre, Th. A. Mueller, D. Lhuillier, M., Cribier, A. Letourneau

TL;DR
This paper identifies a significant discrepancy between observed and predicted reactor antineutrino fluxes, suggesting the possible existence of a new neutrino state, supported by combined experimental data analysis.
Contribution
It provides a revised flux evaluation and demonstrates a statistically significant reactor antineutrino anomaly indicating potential new physics beyond the standard model.
Findings
Observed-to-predicted event ratio is 0.943(0.023).
Anomaly suggests a possible fourth neutrino state with specific oscillation parameters.
Combined data disfavors no-oscillation hypothesis at 99.8% confidence level.
Abstract
Recently new reactor antineutrino spectra have been provided for 235U, 239Pu, 241Pu and 238U, increasing the mean flux by about 3 percent. To good approximation, this reevaluation applies to all reactor neutrino experiments. The synthesis of published experiments at reactor-detector distances <100 m leads to a ratio of observed event rate to predicted rate of 0.976(0.024). With our new flux evaluation, this ratio shifts to 0.943(0.023), leading to a deviation from unity at 98.6% C.L. which we call the reactor antineutrino anomaly. The compatibility of our results with the existence of a fourth non-standard neutrino state driving neutrino oscillations at short distances is discussed. The combined analysis of reactor data, gallium solar neutrino calibration experiments, and MiniBooNE-neutrino data disfavors the no-oscillation hypothesis at 99.8% C.L. The oscillation parameters are such…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
