Testing a Phenomenologically Extended DGP Model with Upcoming Weak Lensing Surveys

TL;DR

This paper evaluates whether upcoming weak lensing surveys like Euclid and DES can distinguish a phenomenologically extended DGP cosmological model from LCDM by analyzing matter and shear power spectra.

Contribution

It introduces a method to test an extended DGP model using weak lensing data and compares two non-linear power spectrum approaches to assess their effectiveness.

Findings

Euclid can distinguish eDGP from LCDM at certain scales using KW approach.

In DES, eDGP and LCDM are nearly indistinguishable within uncertainties.

The choice of non-linear modeling significantly affects the detectability of deviations.

Abstract

A phenomenological extension of the well-known brane-world cosmology of Dvali, Gabadadze and Porrati (eDGP) has recently been proposed. In this model, a cosmological-constant-like term is explicitly present as a non-vanishing tension sigma on the brane, and an extra parameter alpha tunes the cross-over scale r_c, the scale at which higher dimensional gravity effects become non negligible. Since the Hubble parameter in this cosmology reproduces the same LCDM expansion history, we study how upcoming weak lensing surveys, such as Euclid and DES (Dark Energy Survey), can confirm or rule out this class of models. We perform Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations to determine the parameters of the model, using Type Ia Supernov\ae, H(z) data, Gamma Ray Bursts and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations. We also fit the power spectrum of the temperature anisotropies of the Cosmic Microwave Background to obtain the correct normalisation for the density perturbation power spectrum. Then, we compute the matter and the cosmic shear power spectra, both in the linear and non-linear regimes. The latter is calculated with the two different approaches of Hu and Sawicki (2007) (HS) and Khoury and Wyman (2009) (KW). With the eDGP parameters coming from the Markov Chains, KW reproduces the LCDM matter power spectrum at both linear and non-linear scales and the LCDM and eDGP shear signals are degenerate. This result does not hold with the HS prescription: Euclid can distinguish the eDGP model from LCDM because their expected power spectra roughly differ by the 3sigma uncertainty in the angular scale range 700<l<3000; on the contrary, the two models differ at most by the 1sigma uncertainty over the range 500<l<3000 in the DES experiment and they are virtually indistinguishable.