Planck Early Results: Statistical properties of extragalactic radio sources in the Planck Early Release Compact Source Catalogue
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, F. Arg\"ueso, M., Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. Balbi, A. J. Banday, R. B., Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, J.-P. Bernard, M., Bersanelli, R. Bhatia, A. Bonaldi, L. Bonavera, J. R. Bond

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the statistical properties of extragalactic radio sources using Planck's early data, providing source counts across multiple frequencies and revealing spectral steepening above 70 GHz, which impacts CMB contamination estimates.
Contribution
It offers the first comprehensive measurement of radio source counts across a broad frequency range using the full-sky Planck catalogue, and identifies spectral steepening at high frequencies.
Findings
Radio source counts agree with WMAP estimates at lower frequencies.
Spectral steepening observed above 70 GHz reduces expected CMB contamination.
Counts at 143 and 217 GHz connect smoothly with other surveys.
Abstract
The data reported in Planck's Early Release Compact Source Catalogue (ERCSC) are exploited to measure the number counts (dN/dS) of extragalactic radio sources at 30, 44, 70, 100, 143 and 217 GHz. Due to the full-sky nature of the catalogue, this measurement extends to the rarest and brightest sources in the sky. At lower frequencies (30, 44, and 70 GHz) our counts are in very good agreement with estimates based on WMAP data, being somewhat deeper at 30 and 70 GHz, and somewhat shallower at 44 GHz. Planck's source counts at 143 and 217 GHz join smoothly with the fainter ones provided by the SPT and ACT surveys over small fractions of the sky. An analysis of source spectra, exploiting Planck's uniquely broad spectral coverage, finds clear evidence of a steepening of the mean spectral index above about 70 GHz. This implies that, at these frequencies, the contamination of the CMB power…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
