Planck Early Results: Thermal dust in Nearby Molecular Clouds
Planck Collaboration: A. Abergel, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud,, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. Balbi, A. J. Banday, R. B., Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Beno\^it, J.-P., Bernard, M. Bersanelli, R. Bhatia, J. J. Bock, A. Bonaldi

TL;DR
This study uses Planck data to map and analyze thermal dust properties in the Taurus molecular cloud, revealing temperature variations, spectral index anti-correlation, and increased dust optical depth in molecular regions, advancing understanding of dust evolution.
Contribution
First detailed analysis of dust emission in Taurus using Planck data, deriving maps of temperature, spectral index, and optical depth, and examining dust property variations across phases.
Findings
Dust temperature decreases from 16-17 K in diffuse to 13-14 K in dense regions.
Spectral index centered at 1.78 with a systematic anti-correlation with temperature.
Dust optical depth per hydrogen atom increases by a factor of 2 from atomic to molecular phases.
Abstract
Planck allows unbiased mapping of Galactic sub-millimetre and millimetre emission from the most diffuse regions to the densest parts of molecular clouds. We present an early analysis of the Taurus molecular complex, on line-of-sight-averaged data and without component separation. The emission spectrum measured by Planck and IRAS can be fitted pixel by pixel using a single modified blackbody. Some systematic residuals are detected at 353 GHz and 143 GHz, with amplitudes around -7 % and +13 %, respectively, indicating that the measured spectra are likely more complex than a simple modified blackbody. Significant positive residuals are also detected in the molecular regions and in the 217 GHz and 100 GHz bands, mainly caused by to the contribution of the J=2-1 and J=1-0 12CO and 13CO emission lines. We derive maps of the dust temperature T, the dust spectral emissivity index beta, and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
