Planck early results. IX. XMM-Newton follow-up for validation of Planck cluster candidates
Planck Collaboration: N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C., Baccigalupi, A. Balbi, A.J. Banday, R.B. Barreiro, M. Bartelmann, J.G., Bartlett, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Beno\^it, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli,, R. Bhatia, J.J. Bock, A. Bonaldi, J.R. Bond, J. Borrill

TL;DR
This study uses XMM-Newton follow-up observations to confirm and analyze Planck-detected galaxy cluster candidates, revealing their properties, redshifts, and morphologies, and comparing their X-ray and SZ signals to improve cluster validation.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed X-ray characterization of Planck cluster candidates, validating their nature and properties, and enhances the cluster selection process.
Findings
21 out of 25 candidates confirmed as clusters
Discovery of a supercluster at z=0.45
Clusters follow established Y_SZ-Y_X relation
Abstract
We present the XMM-Newton follow-up for confirmation of Planck cluster candidates. Twenty-five candidates have been observed to date using snapshot (~10 ksec) exposures, ten as part of a pilot programme to sample a low range of signal-to-noise ratios (4<S/N<6), and a further 15 in a programme to observe a sample of S/N>5 candidates. The sensitivity and spatial resolution of XMM-Newton allows unambiguous discrimination between clusters and false candidates. The 4 false candidates have S/N <= 4.1. A total of 21 candidates are confirmed as extended X-ray sources. Seventeen are single clusters, the majority of which are found to have highly irregular and disturbed morphologies (about ~70%). The remaining four sources are multiple systems, including the unexpected discovery of a supercluster at z=0.45. For 20 sources we are able to derive a redshift estimate from the X-ray Fe K line (albeit…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
