The Complexity of 3SAT_N and the P versus NP Problem
Ruijia Liao

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new NP-complete problem 3SAT_N, extends existing classification theorems, and uses novel methods to prove that P does not equal NP, advancing understanding of computational complexity.
Contribution
It defines 3SAT_N, generalizes truth assignments, and employs a combination of algorithms and diagonalization to prove P != NP.
Findings
Introduction of 3SAT_N as an NP-complete problem
Generalization of truth assignments to aggressive truth assignments
Proof that P != NP
Abstract
We introduce the NP-complete problem 3SAT_N and extend Tovey's results to a classification theorem for this problem. This theorem leads us to generalize the concept of truth assignments for SAT to aggressive truth assignments for 3SAT_N. We introduce the concept of a set compatible with the P and NP problem, and prove that all aggressive truth assignments are pseudo-algorithms. We combine algorithm, pseudo-algorithm and diagonalization method to study the complexity of 3SAT_N and the P versus NP problem. The main result is P != NP.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Optimization and Search Problems
