The Black-Hole Mass in M87 from Gemini/NIFS Adaptive Optics Observations
Karl Gebhardt, Joshua Adams, Douglas Richstone, Tod R. Lauer, S. M., Faber, Kayhan Gultekin, Jeremy Murphy, Scott Tremaine

TL;DR
This study measures the supermassive black hole in M87 using adaptive optics and stellar kinematics, confirming a mass around 6.6 billion solar masses and highlighting the importance of high-resolution data for accurate estimates.
Contribution
First direct measurement of M87's black hole mass using Gemini/NIFS adaptive optics with orbit-based models, emphasizing the role of high-resolution data in breaking degeneracies.
Findings
Black hole mass in M87 is approximately 6.6 billion solar masses.
Adaptive optics data reduces uncertainty and breaks degeneracy between black hole mass and stellar mass-to-light ratio.
Black hole mass exceeds predictions from standard scaling relations, indicating possible revisions needed.
Abstract
We present the stellar kinematics in the central 2" of the luminous elliptical galaxy M87 (NGC 4486), using laser adaptive optics to feed the Gemini telescope integral-field spectrograph, NIFS. The velocity dispersion rises to 480 km/s at 0.2". We combine these data with extensive stellar kinematics out to large radii to derive a black-hole mass equal to (6.6+-0.4)x10^9 Msun, using orbit-based axisymmetric models and including only the NIFS data in the central region. Including previously-reported ground-based data in the central region drops the uncertainty to 0.25x10^9 Msun with no change in the best-fit mass; however, we rely on the values derived from the NIFS-only data in the central region in order to limit systematic differences. The best-fit model shows a significant increase in the tangential velocity anisotropy of stars orbiting in the central region with decreasing radius;…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
