Estimators of Fractal Dimension: Assessing the Roughness of Time Series and Spatial Data
Tilmann Gneiting, Hana \v{S}ev\v{c}\'ikov\'a, Donald B. Percival

TL;DR
This paper reviews and assesses various estimators of fractal dimension for time series and spatial data, recommending the madogram estimator for its efficiency and robustness based on extensive simulations and data analysis.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive evaluation of fractal dimension estimators, introduces robust transect estimators for 2D data, and offers practical recommendations based on efficiency and robustness.
Findings
Madogram estimator is recommended for time series analysis.
Robust transect estimators are proposed for 2D lattice data.
Power variation with p=1 is particularly effective for estimating Hausdorff dimension.
Abstract
The fractal or Hausdorff dimension is a measure of roughness (or smoothness) for time series and spatial data. The graph of a smooth, differentiable surface indexed in has topological and fractal dimension . If the surface is nondifferentiable and rough, the fractal dimension takes values between the topological dimension, , and . We review and assess estimators of fractal dimension by their large sample behavior under infill asymptotics, in extensive finite sample simulation studies, and in a data example on arctic sea-ice profiles. For time series or line transect data, box-count, Hall--Wood, semi-periodogram, discrete cosine transform and wavelet estimators are studied along with variation estimators with power indices 2 (variogram) and 1 (madogram), all implemented in the R package fractaldim. Considering both efficiency and robustness, we recommend the use…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
