How Typical Are The Local Group Dwarf Galaxies?
Daniel R. Weisz (1,2), Andrew E. Dolphin (3), Julianne J. Dalcanton, (1), Evan D. Skillman (2), Jon Holtzman (4), Benjamin F. Williams (1),, Karoline M. Gilbert (1), Anil C. Seth (5), Andrew Cole (6), Stephanie M., Gogarten (1), Keith Rosema (1), Igor D. Karachentsev (7)

TL;DR
This study compares star formation histories of Local Group dwarf galaxies with those in the nearby universe, finding they are similar in evolution and environmental relationships, supporting the representativeness of the Local Group dwarfs.
Contribution
It provides a uniform comparison of SFHs across different environments, confirming the Local Group dwarfs' typicality relative to nearby universe dwarf galaxies.
Findings
LG and ANGST dwarf galaxies have similar mean SFHs.
Both samples show a strong morphology-density relationship.
Dwarf irregulars are found at lower densities and higher luminosities.
Abstract
We compare the cumulative star formation histories (SFHs) of Local Group (LG) dwarf galaxies with those in the volume-limited ACS Nearby Galaxy Survey Treasury (ANGST) sample (D < 4 Mpc), in order to understand how typical the LG dwarf galaxies are relative to those in the nearby universe. The SFHs were derived in a uniform manner from high quality optical color-magnitude diagrams constructed from Hubble Space Telescope imaging. We find that the {\it mean} cumulative SFHs of the LG dwarfs are comparable to the mean cumulative SFHs of the ANGST sample for the three different morphological types (dwarf spheroidals/ellipticals: dSph/dE; dwarf irregulars: dI; transition dwarfs: dTrans). We also discuss effects such as population gradients and systematic uncertainties in the stellar models that may influence the derived SFHs. Both the ANGST and Local Group dwarf galaxies show a consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
