Are we teaching students to think like scientists?
J. Christopher Moore, Louis J. Rubbo

TL;DR
This paper examines whether university courses for non-science majors effectively develop scientific reasoning skills, highlighting recent pedagogical advances and the importance of fostering scientific thinking beyond content knowledge.
Contribution
It emphasizes the need to focus on teaching scientific reasoning in non-science courses and reviews recent progress in pedagogical methods for this population.
Findings
Large gains on concept tests reported for non-science courses
Focus shifting from content to reasoning skills in pedagogy
Importance of teaching students to think like scientists
Abstract
University courses in conceptual physics and astronomy typically serve as the terminal science experience for non-science majors. Significant work has gone into developing research-verified pedagogical methods for the algebra- and calculus-based physics courses typically populated by natural and physical science majors; however, there is significantly less volume in the literature concerning the non-science population. This is quickly changing, and large, repeatable gains on concept tests are being reported. However, we may be losing sight of what is arguably the most important goal of such a course: development of scientific reasoning. Are we teaching this population of students to think like scientists?
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScience Education and Pedagogy · Science Education and Perceptions
