
TL;DR
This paper investigates the discrepancy between two renormalisation group resummation methods, FOPT and CIPT, in determining alpha_s from hadronic tau decays, using a model based on renormalons to analyze their effectiveness.
Contribution
It introduces a model incorporating renormalon structure to compare FOPT and CIPT, showing FOPT's better alignment with the Borel sum in tau decay calculations.
Findings
FOPT approaches the Borel sum smoothly.
CIPT fails to account for the resummed series.
Model demonstrates the impact of renormalons on resummation methods.
Abstract
The determination of alpha_s from hadronic tau decays is impeded by the fact that two choices for the renormalisation group resummation, namely fixed-order (FOPT) and contour-improved perturbation theory (CIPT), yield systematically differing results. On the basis of a model for higher-order terms in the perturbative series, which incorporates well-known structure from renormalons, it is found that FOPT smoothly approaches the Borel sum for the tau hadronic width, while CIPT is unable to account for the resummed series. An example for the behaviour of QCD spectral function moments, displaying a similar behaviour, is presented as well.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
