Assessment of Dressed Time-Dependent Density-Functional Theory for the Low-Lying Valence States of 28 Organic Chromophores
Miquel Huix-Rotllant, Andrei Ipatov, Angel Rubio, and Mark E. Casida

TL;DR
This study evaluates dressed TDDFT's effectiveness in predicting low-lying valence excited states of 28 organic chromophores, highlighting the importance of functional choice and Hartree-Fock exchange inclusion for accurate results.
Contribution
First extensive testing of dressed TDDFT for excitation energies, demonstrating the impact of functional selection and exchange inclusion on accuracy.
Findings
D-TDDFT with Hartree-Fock exchange improves excitation energy predictions.
Choice of functional critically affects positioning of 1h1p and 2h2p states.
Without Hartree-Fock exchange, D-TDDFT increases errors in excitation energies.
Abstract
Almost all time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT) calculations of excited states make use of the adiabatic approximation, which implies a frequency-independent exchange-correlation kernel that limits applications to one-hole/one-particle states. To remedy this problem, Maitra et al.[J.Chem.Phys. 120, 5932 (2004)] proposed dressed TDDFT (D-TDDFT), which includes explicit two-hole/two-particle states by adding a frequency-dependent term to adiabatic TDDFT. This paper offers the first extensive test of D-TDDFT, and its ability to represent excitation energies in a general fashion. We present D-TDDFT excited states for 28 chromophores and compare them with the benchmark results of Schreiber et al.[J.Chem.Phys. 128, 134110 (2008).] We find the choice of functional used for the A-TDDFT step to be critical for positioning the 1h1p states with respect to the 2h2p states. We observe…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
