Observational Constraints on Superbubble X-ray Energy Budgets
A. E. Jaskot, D. K. Strickland, M. S. Oey, Y.-H. Chu, G., Garc\'ia-Segura

TL;DR
This study uses Chandra observations of superbubbles in the LMC to analyze their X-ray energy budgets, highlighting the roles of SNR impacts and mass-loading in X-ray emission, and comparing findings to theoretical models.
Contribution
It provides new observational evidence on the sources of X-ray emission in superbubbles, emphasizing the importance of SNR impacts and mass-loading processes.
Findings
Approximately 50% of X-ray emission is from SNR impact regions.
Mass-loading from clouds and metallicity enrichment are minor contributors.
DEM L50 is likely not in collisional ionization equilibrium.
Abstract
The hot, X-ray-emitting gas in superbubbles imparts energy and enriched material to the interstellar medium (ISM) and generates the hot ionized medium, the ISM's high-temperature component. The evolution of superbubble energy budgets is not well understood, however, and the processes responsible for enhanced X-ray emission in superbubbles remain a matter of debate. We present Chandra ACIS-S observations of two X-ray-bright superbubbles in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), DEM L50 (N186) and DEM L152 (N44), with an emphasis on disentangling the true superbubble X-ray emission from non-related diffuse emission and determining the spatial origin and spectral variation of the X-ray emission. An examination of the superbubble energy budgets shows that on the order of 50% of the X-ray emission comes from regions associated with supernova remnant (SNR) impacts. We find some evidence of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
