Role of different model ingredients in the exotic cluster-decay of $^{56}Ni^*$
Narinder K. Dhiman

TL;DR
This study investigates how various model ingredients affect the cluster decay of $^{56}$Ni*, finding that different parameters have minimal impact on decay predictions, thus supporting current modeling practices.
Contribution
The paper systematically examines the influence of different Fermi density and nuclear radius parameters on cluster decay calculations of $^{56}$Ni*.
Findings
Decay half-lives vary within ±10% across different parameters.
Transfer structure of fractional yields remains largely unaffected.
Current parameter choices are justified for cluster decay modeling.
Abstract
We present cluster decay studies of Ni formed in heavy-ion collisions using different Fermi density and nuclear radius parameters proposed by various authors. Our study reveals that different technical parameters do not alter the transfer structure of fractional yields significantly. The cluster decay half-lives of different clusters lies within 10% for different Fermi density parameters and nuclear radius, therefore, justify the current set of parameters used in the literature for the calculations of cluster decay.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
