On the Equivalence of the General Covariance Union (GCU) and Minimum Enclosing Ellipsoid (MEE) Problems
Ottmar Bochardt, Jeffrey Uhlmann

TL;DR
This paper proves the surprising equivalence between the General Covariance Union and Minimum Enclosing Ellipsoid problems, linking covariance-based filtering methods with geometric data fusion approaches.
Contribution
It establishes the theoretical equivalence between GCU and MEE, bridging statistical and geometric interpretations in data fusion.
Findings
GCU and MEE solutions are mathematically equivalent.
The result connects covariance-based and geometric data fusion methods.
This equivalence has implications for filtering and data fusion techniques.
Abstract
In this paper we describe General Covariance Union (GCU) and show that solutions to GCU and the Minimum Enclosing Ellipsoid (MEE) problems are equivalent. This is a surprising result because GCU is defined over positive semidefinite (PSD) matrices with statistical interpretations while MEE involves PSD matrices with geometric interpretations. Their equivalence establishes an intersection between the seemingly disparate methodologies of covariance-based (e.g., Kalman) filtering and bounded region approaches to data fusion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks · Statistical and numerical algorithms · GNSS positioning and interference
