Electromagnetic response of a highly granular hadronic calorimeter
C. Adloff, J. Blaha, J.-J. Blaising, C. Drancourt, A. Espargili\`ere,, R. Gaglione, N. Geffroy, Y. Karyotakis, J. Prast, G. Vouters, K. Francis, J., Repond, J. Smith, L. Xia, E. Baldolemar, J. Li, S. T. Park, M. Sosebee, A. P., White, J. Yu, Y. Mikami, N. K. Watson T. Goto

TL;DR
This paper investigates the electromagnetic response of a highly granular steel-scintillator hadronic calorimeter prototype, focusing on linearity and uniformity, validated through tests with electron beams at CERN SPS.
Contribution
It presents the design, construction, and calibration of a large, highly granular calorimeter prototype and evaluates its electromagnetic response using experimental beam data.
Findings
The calorimeter demonstrates good linearity in response to electrons.
Uniformity across the detector is validated through calibration.
The prototype's performance supports future collider detector designs.
Abstract
The CALICE collaboration is studying the design of high performance electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters for future International Linear Collider detectors. For the hadronic calorimeter, one option is a highly granular sampling calorimeter with steel as absorber and scintillator layers as active material. High granularity is obtained by segmenting the scintillator into small tiles individually read out via silicon photo-multipliers (SiPM). A prototype has been built, consisting of thirty-eight sensitive layers, segmented into about eight thousand channels. In 2007 the prototype was exposed to positrons and hadrons using the CERN SPS beam, covering a wide range of beam energies and incidence angles. The challenge of cell equalization and calibration of such a large number of channels is best validated using electromagnetic processes. The response of the prototype…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
