A note on the optimality of decomposable entanglement witnesses and completely entangled subspaces
Remigiusz Augusiak, Jordi Tura, Maciej Lewenstein

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which decomposable entanglement witnesses are optimal, revealing a specific equivalence in qubit-qunit systems and demonstrating limitations in higher-dimensional spaces.
Contribution
It establishes a new equivalence condition for optimality of decomposable entanglement witnesses in qubit-qunit systems and explores its failure in higher dimensions.
Findings
In qubit-qunit systems, optimality, spanning product vectors, and partial transposition are equivalent.
In C^{3}⊗C^{3} systems, the equivalence breaks down, showing limitations of the characterization.
The paper provides insights into the structure of entanglement witnesses and their optimality conditions.
Abstract
Entanglement witnesses (EWs) constitute one of the most important entanglement detectors in quantum systems. Nevertheless, their complete characterization, in particular with respect to the notion of optimality, is still missing, even in the decomposable case. Here we show that for any qubit-qunit decomposable EW (DEW) W the three statements are equivalent: (i) the set of product vectors obeying \bra{e,f}W\ket{e,f}=0 spans the corresponding Hilbert space, (ii) W is optimal, (iii) W=Q^{\Gamma} with Q denoting a positive operator supported on a completely entangled subspace (CES) and \Gamma standing for the partial transposition. While, implications and are known, here we prove that (iii) implies (i). This is a consequence of a more general fact saying that product vectors orthogonal to any CES in C^{2}\otimes C^{n} span after partial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
