The Coriolis Effect Apparently Described in Giovanni Battista Riccioli's Arguments Against the Motion of the Earth: An English Rendition of Almagestum Novum Part II, Book 9, Section 4, Chapter 21, Pages 425, 426-7
Christopher M. Graney

TL;DR
This paper analyzes Giovanni Battista Riccioli's 1651 argument against Earth's rotation, highlighting its early description of what is now known as the Coriolis effect in the context of historical scientific debates.
Contribution
It uncovers and contextualizes Riccioli's early argument as an early description of the Coriolis effect within 17th-century astronomy.
Findings
Riccioli's argument predates formal description of Coriolis effect
Historical analysis of 17th-century scientific debates
Identification of early physics concepts in historical texts
Abstract
In his encyclopedic work on astronomy, the 1651 Almagestum Novum, the Italian Jesuit Giovanni Battista Riccioli (1598-1671) argued against the movement of the Earth on the grounds that (among other things), if the Earth rotated, that rotation should produce a deflection in the trajectories of projectiles. This argument appears to be an early description of the Coriolis effect.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistorical Astronomy and Related Studies · Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies · History of Science and Medicine
