Confirmation of IGR J01363+6610 as a Be X-ray binary with very low quiescent X-ray luminosity
John A. Tomsick (SSL/UC Berkeley), Craig Heinke (Univ. of Alberta),, Jules Halpern (Columbia University), Philip Kaaret (Univ. of Iowa), Sylvain, Chaty (AIM - Univ. Paris VII, CEA Saclay), Jerome Rodriguez (AIM - Univ., Paris VII, CEA Saclay), and Arash Bodaghee (SSL/UC Berkeley)

TL;DR
This paper confirms IGR J01363+6610 as a Be X-ray binary with an unusually low quiescent X-ray luminosity, providing insights into its physical properties and variability.
Contribution
The study provides the first detection of IGR J01363+6610 in quiescence with detailed spectral analysis, confirming its classification as a Be X-ray binary with very low luminosity.
Findings
Detected variable X-ray source consistent with a Be star counterpart.
Measured very low quiescent X-ray luminosity (~9.1e31 erg/s).
Observed spectral properties indicative of a hard power-law spectrum.
Abstract
The field containing the candidate High Mass X-ray Binary IGR J01363+6610 was observed by XMM-Newton on 2009 July 31 for 28 ks. A Be star was previously suggested as the possible counterpart of the INTEGRAL source, and although Chandra, during a 2007 observation, did not detect an X-ray source at the position of the Be star, we find a variable source (XMMU J013549.5+661243) with an average X-ray flux of 2e-13 ergs/cm2/s (0.2-12 keV, unabsorbed) at this position with XMM-Newton. The spectrum of this source is consistent with a hard power-law with a photon index of 1.4 +/- 0.3 and a column density of 1.5e22 cm^-2 (90% confidence errors). These results, along with our optical investigation of other X-ray sources in the field, makes the association with the Be star very likely, and the 2 kpc distance estimate for the Be star indicates an X-ray luminosity of 9.1e31 ergs/s. This is lower than…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
