Comment on "Delayed luminescence of biological systems in terms of coherent states" [Phys. Lett. A 293 (2002) 93]
Vahid Salari, Christian Brouder

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a proposed model for delayed luminescence based on coherent states, demonstrating it predicts a linear time dependence incompatible with experimental data and identifying errors in the original oscillatory functions used.
Contribution
The authors provide a critical analysis showing the original model's limitations and correcting the mathematical inaccuracies in describing delayed luminescence.
Findings
Original model predicts linear time dependence, conflicting with observed data.
Oscillatory functions used are not solutions of the coupling equations.
Model's incompatibility with experimental delayed luminescence.
Abstract
Popp and Yan [F. A. Popp, Y. Yan, Phys. Lett. A 293 (2002) 93] proposed a model for delayed luminescence based on a single time-dependent coherent state. We show that the general solution of their model corresponds to a luminescence that is a linear function of time. Therefore, their model is not compatible with any measured delayed luminescence. Moreover, the functions that they use to describe the oscillatory behaviour of delayed luminescence are not solutions of the coupling equations to be solved.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
