A Simple Correctness Proof for Magic Transformation
Wlodzimierz Drabent

TL;DR
This paper provides a straightforward correctness proof for the magic transformation, linking declarative and operational semantics, and demonstrating a concise formal reasoning approach for logic programs.
Contribution
It introduces a simple, concise proof method for the correctness of the magic transformation, enhancing formal reasoning in logic programming.
Findings
Proof confirms correctness of magic transformation
Connects declarative and operational semantics
Demonstrates a concise proof technique
Abstract
The paper presents a simple and concise proof of correctness of the magic transformation. We believe it may provide a useful example of formal reasoning about logic programs. The correctness property concerns the declarative semantics. The proof, however, refers to the operational semantics (LD-resolution) of the source programs. Its conciseness is due to applying a suitable proof method.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Formal Methods in Verification
