Designing Incentive Schemes Based on Intervention: The Case of Imperfect Monitoring
Jaeok Park, Mihaela van der Schaar

TL;DR
This paper introduces an intervention-based incentive scheme to promote cooperation among self-interested users, balancing signal quality and delay effects to optimize network performance.
Contribution
It develops an optimal intervention rule and determines the best test period length considering imperfect signals and strategic behavior.
Findings
Longer test periods improve signal accuracy
Extended delays weaken cooperation incentives
Optimal intervention balances signal quality and delay effects
Abstract
We propose an incentive scheme based on intervention to sustain cooperation among self-interested users. In the proposed scheme, an intervention device collects imperfect signals about the actions of the users for a test period, and then chooses the level of intervention that degrades the performance of the network for the remaining time period. We analyze the problems of designing an optimal intervention rule given a test period and choosing an optimal length of the test period. The intervention device can provide the incentive for cooperation by exerting intervention following signals that involve a high likelihood of deviation. Increasing the length of the test period has two counteracting effects on the performance: It improves the quality of signals, but at the same time it weakens the incentive for cooperation due to increased delay.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
