High C/O Ratio and Weak Thermal Inversion in the Very Hot Atmosphere of Exoplanet WASP-12b
Nikku Madhusudhan, Joseph Harrington, Kevin B. Stevenson, Sarah, Nymeyer, Christopher J. Campo, Peter J. Wheatley, Drake Deming, Jasmina, Blecic, Ryan A. Hardy, Nate B. Lust, David R. Anderson, Andrew, Collier-Cameron, Christopher B. T. Britt, William C. Bowman, Leslie Hebb,

TL;DR
This study reveals that the hot Jupiter WASP-12b has a super-solar C/O ratio, lacks a thermal inversion, and exhibits efficient energy circulation, challenging existing models of highly irradiated exoplanet atmospheres.
Contribution
It provides the first evidence of a super-solar C/O ratio and weak thermal inversion in WASP-12b's atmosphere, contrasting with theoretical expectations.
Findings
C/O ratio >= 1 in WASP-12b's atmosphere
Depletion of water vapor and enrichment of methane
Absence of a thermal inversion despite high irradiation
Abstract
The carbon-to-oxygen ratio (C/O) in a planet provides critical information about its primordial origins and subsequent evolution. A primordial C/O greater than 0.8 causes a carbide-dominated interior as opposed to a silicate-dominated composition as found on Earth, and the atmospheres can also differ from those in the Solar System. The solar C/O is 0.54. Here we report an analysis of dayside multi-wavelength photometry of the transiting hot-Jupiter WASP-12b that reveals C/O >= 1 in its atmosphere. The atmosphere is abundant in CO. It is depleted in water vapor and enhanced in methane by over two orders of magnitude each compared to a solar-abundance chemical-equilibrium model at the expected temperatures. We also find that the extremely irradiated atmosphere (T > 2,500 K) of WASP-12b lacks a prominent thermal inversion, or a stratosphere, and has very efficient day- night energy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
