Comment: How Should Indirect Evidence Be Used?
Robert E. Kass

TL;DR
This paper discusses the importance of indirect evidence in statistical practice and emphasizes the need for better understanding of how statistical methods relate to scientific problems, suggesting a nuanced approach to using indirect evidence.
Contribution
It highlights the significance of indirect evidence and advocates for future research to clarify the connection between statistical methods and scientific questions.
Findings
Indirect evidence is crucial for statistical success.
Sometimes informal use of indirect evidence is preferable.
Future research should focus on linking statistical methods with scientific problems.
Abstract
Indirect evidence is crucial for successful statistical practice. Sometimes, however, it is better used informally. Future efforts should be directed toward understanding better the connection between statistical methods and scientific problems. [arXiv:1012.1161]
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
