A tale of two GRB-SNe at a common redshift of z = 0.54
Z. Cano, D. Bersier, C. Guidorzi, R. Margutti, K.M Svensson, S., Kobayashi, A. Melandri, K. Wiersema, A. Pozanenko, A.J. van der Horst, G. G., Pooley, A. Fernandez-Soto, A.J. Castro-Tirado, A. de Ugarte Postigo, M. Im,, A. P. Kamble, D. Sahu, J. Alonso-Lorite, G. Anupama

TL;DR
This study presents detailed optical observations of two GRB-associated supernovae at z=0.54, comparing their properties with known supernovae and analyzing afterglow characteristics to understand their nature.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed optical analysis of two GRB-SNe at the same redshift, comparing their light curves and spectra with known supernovae, and discusses afterglow properties within a jet model.
Findings
Both SNe resemble SN1998bw more than SN1994I.
The afterglow of GRB 090618 shows a jet-break at >0.5 days.
Peak magnitudes of GRB/XRF-SNe are similar to local type Ibc SNe.
Abstract
We present ground-based and HST optical observations of the optical transients (OTs) of long-duration Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) 060729 and 090618, both at a redshift of z = 0.54. For GRB 060729, bumps are seen in the optical light curves (LCs), and the late-time broadband spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of the OT resemble those of local type Ic supernovae (SNe). For GRB 090618, the dense sampling of our optical observations has allowed us to detect well-defined bumps in the optical LCs, as well as a change in colour, that are indicative of light coming from a core-collapse SN. The accompanying SNe for both events are individually compared with SN1998bw, a known GRB-supernova, and SN1994I, a typical type Ic supernova without a known GRB counterpart, and in both cases the brightness and temporal evolution more closely resemble SN1998bw. We also exploit our extensive optical and radio…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
