The Complexity of Approximately Counting Stable Roommate Assignments
Prasad Chebolu, Leslie Ann Goldberg, Russell Martin

TL;DR
This paper explores the computational complexity of approximately counting stable roommate assignments in specific geometric and attribute-based models, establishing their equivalence to well-known hard counting problems and implications for approximation algorithms.
Contribution
The paper proves that counting stable roommate assignments in certain models is as hard as #IS and #SAT, and shows no efficient approximation scheme exists unless NP=RP.
Findings
Counting in these models is interreducible with #IS and #SAT.
No FPRAS exists for counting stable roommate assignments unless NP=RP.
The 1-attribute stable roommate problem has at most two solutions, allowing polynomial-time exact counting.
Abstract
We investigate the complexity of approximately counting stable roommate assignments in two models: (i) the -attribute model, in which the preference lists are determined by dot products of "preference vectors" with "attribute vectors" and (ii) the -Euclidean model, in which the preference lists are determined by the closeness of the "positions" of the people to their "preferred positions". Exactly counting the number of assignments is #P-complete, since Irving and Leather demonstrated #P-completeness for the special case of the stable marriage problem. We show that counting the number of stable roommate assignments in the -attribute model () and the 3-Euclidean model() is interreducible, in an approximation-preserving sense, with counting independent sets (of all sizes) (#IS) in a graph, or counting the number of satisfying assignments of a Boolean formula…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
