Limits on non-local correlations from the structure of the local state space
Peter Janotta, Christian Gogolin, Jonathan Barrett, and Nicolas, Brunner

TL;DR
This paper explores how the structure of local state spaces in probabilistic theories influences the strength of nonlocal correlations, revealing geometric properties that determine whether such correlations can violate quantum bounds like Tsirelson's.
Contribution
It establishes a connection between local state space geometry and nonlocal correlation strength, including a general theorem limiting violations of macroscopic locality.
Findings
Nonlocal correlations depend on the geometric property of strong self-duality.
Models with polygonal local state spaces can exhibit varying degrees of nonlocality.
Certain models can produce maximally nonlocal correlations while remaining locally similar to quantum mechanics.
Abstract
The outcomes of measurements on entangled quantum systems can be nonlocally correlated. However, while it is easy to write down toy theories allowing arbitrary nonlocal correlations, those allowed in quantum mechanics are limited. Quantum correlations cannot, for example, violate a principle known as macroscopic locality, which implies that they cannot violate Tsirelson's bound. This work shows that there is a connection between the strength of nonlocal correlations in a physical theory, and the structure of the state spaces of individual systems. This is illustrated by a family of models in which local state spaces are regular polygons, where a natural analogue of a maximally entangled state of two systems exists. We characterize the nonlocal correlations obtainable from such states. The family allows us to study the transition between classical, quantum, and super-quantum…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
