Kolmogorov-Loveland Sets and Advice Complexity Classes
Thomas Hugel

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between Loveland complexity, a variant of Kolmogorov complexity, and advice complexity classes, revealing structural connections that impact hierarchy and natural proof properties.
Contribution
It establishes a structural link between Loveland sets and advice complexity classes, extending known properties of Kolmogorov sets to advice complexity theory.
Findings
Non-inclusion of Loveland sets implies hierarchy in advice classes
Immunity of Loveland sets indicates absence of natural proofs
Structural connections enable transfer of properties between concepts
Abstract
Loveland complexity is a variant of Kolmogorov complexity, where it is asked to output separately the bits of the desired string, instead of the string itself. Similarly to the resource-bounded Kolmogorov sets we define Loveland sets. We highlight a structural connection between resource-bounded Loveland sets and some advice complexity classes. This structural connection enables us to map to advice complexity classes some properties of Kolmogorov sets first noticed by Hartmanis and thoroughly investigated in Longpr\'e's thesis: 1. Non-inclusion properties of Loveland sets result in hierarchy properties on the corresponding advice complexity classes; 2. Immunity properties of Loveland sets result in the non-existence of natural proofs between the corresponding advice complexity classes, in the sense of Razborov & Rudich.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection · semigroups and automata theory
