A critical analysis of the UV Luminosity Function at redshift~7 from deep WFC3 data
A. Grazian (1), M. Castellano (1), A. M. Koekemoer (2), A. Fontana, (1), L. Pentericci (1), V. Testa (1), K. Boutsia (1), E. Giallongo (1), M., Giavalisco (3), P. Santini (1) ((1) INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma

TL;DR
This paper critically analyzes the UV luminosity function of z~7 Lyman Break Galaxies using diverse deep and wide surveys, highlighting uncertainties and implications for cosmic reionization.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive assessment of systematic and statistical errors in the z~7 LF determination, emphasizing the impact of galaxy size assumptions on the faint-end slope.
Findings
Faint LBG number density is marginally affected by color selection.
LF slope uncertainty is large due to unknown galaxy size distribution.
Galaxies at z~7 likely cannot reionize the Universe without evolution or undetected populations.
Abstract
The study of the Luminosity Function (LF) of Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs) at z=7 is important for ascertaining their role in the reionization of the Universe. We perform a detailed and critical analysis of the statistical and systematic errors in the z~7 LF determination: we have assembled a large sample of candidate LBGs at z~7 from different surveys, spanning a large variety of areas and depths. In particular, we have combined data from the deep (J<27.4) and ultradeep (J<29.2) surveys recently acquired with the new WFC3 NIR camera on HST, over the GOODS-ERS and the HUDF fields, with ground based surveys in wide and shallow areas from VLT and Subaru. We have used public ACS images in the z-band to select z-dropout galaxies, and other public data both in the blue (BVI) and in the red bands to reject possible low-redshift interlopers. We have compared our results with extensive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
