Does ignorance of the whole imply ignorance of the parts? - Large violations of non-contextuality in quantum theory

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that, unlike classical models, quantum theory allows for large ignorance of a whole system while maintaining almost perfect knowledge of its parts, revealing fundamental non-classical correlations.

Contribution

The authors introduce an information-theoretic inequality that holds in non-contextual hidden variable models but is violated by quantum mechanics, highlighting fundamental non-classicality.

Findings

Quantum theory violates the classical inequality.

Large ignorance of the whole can coexist with knowledge of parts in quantum systems.

Implications for quantum cryptography are discussed.

Abstract

A central question in our understanding of the physical world is how our knowledge of the whole relates to our knowledge of the individual parts. One aspect of this question is the following: to what extent does ignorance about a whole preclude knowledge of at least one of its parts? Relying purely on classical intuition, one would certainly be inclined to conjecture that a strong ignorance of the whole cannot come without significant ignorance of at least one of its parts. Indeed, we show that this reasoning holds in any non-contextual hidden variable model (NC-HV). Curiously, however, such a conjecture is \emph{false} in quantum theory: we provide an explicit example where a large ignorance about the whole can coexist with an almost perfect knowledge of each of its parts. More specifically, we provide a simple information-theoretic inequality satisfied in any NC-HV, but which can be \emph{arbitrarily} violated by quantum mechanics. Our inequality has interesting implications for quantum cryptography.