The effect of limiting resources in aging populations
Chrysline Margus Pinol, Ronald Banzon

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different implementations of the Verhulst carrying capacity term affect aging population models, specifically comparing its application to all individuals versus only newborns in the Penna model.
Contribution
It introduces and compares two approaches to implementing the Verhulst term in the Penna aging model, highlighting their impact on simulation outcomes.
Findings
Variations in model features depending on Verhulst implementation
Differences observed when Verhulst deaths are restricted to specific age groups
Insights into resource limitation effects on aging population dynamics
Abstract
The concept of a carrying capacity is essential in most models to prevent unlimited growth. Despite the large amount of deaths it introduces, the actual influence of the Verhulst term in simulations is often times not accounted for. Generally, it is treated merely as a scaling parameter that functions to keep simulated populations within computer limits. Here, we compare two different implementations of the concept in the Penna model - Vehulst applied to all individuals (VA) and to newborns only (VB). We observe variations in certain model features when random Verhulst deaths are restricted to a single age group.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics · Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management · COVID-19 epidemiological studies
