Frequentist Analysis of the Parameter Space of Minimal Supergravity

TL;DR

This paper performs a comprehensive frequentist analysis of minimal supergravity models, integrating experimental data to evaluate parameter spaces and compare model probabilities, with implications for future collider signatures.

Contribution

It introduces a detailed frequentist likelihood analysis of mSUGRA and VCMSSM, contrasting their parameter spaces and probabilities with other supersymmetry models.

Findings

mSUGRA has two preferred parameter regions with distinct mass scales

VCMSSM favors parameter values similar to CMSSM and NUHM1

mSUGRA is less consistent with current data than other models

Abstract

We make a frequentist analysis of the parameter space of minimal supergravity (mSUGRA), in which, as well as the gaugino and scalar soft supersymmetry-breaking parameters being universal, there is a specific relation between the trilinear, bilinear and scalar supersymmetry-breaking parameters, A_0 = B_0 + m_0, and the gravitino mass is fixed by m_{3/2} = m_0. We also consider a more general model, in which the gravitino mass constraint is relaxed (the VCMSSM). We combine in the global likelihood function the experimental constraints from low-energy electroweak precision data, the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, the lightest Higgs boson mass M_h, B physics and the astrophysical cold dark matter density, assuming that the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) is a neutralino. In the VCMSSM, we find a preference for values of m_{1/2} and m_0 similar to those found previously in frequentist analyses of the constrained MSSM (CMSSM) and a model with common non-universal Higgs masses (NUHM1). On the other hand, in mSUGRA we find two preferred regions: one with larger values of both m_{1/2} and m_0 than in the VCMSSM, and one with large m_0 but small m_{1/2}. We compare the probabilities of the frequentist fits in mSUGRA, the VCMSSM, the CMSSM and the NUHM1: the probability that mSUGRA is consistent with the present data is significantly less than in the other models. We also discuss the mSUGRA and VCMSSM predictions for sparticle masses and other observables, identifying potential signatures at the LHC and elsewhere.