Knotted surfaces and equivalencies of their diagrams without triple points
Michal Jablonowski

TL;DR
This paper investigates the equivalence of knotted surfaces in four-dimensional space via their projections without triple points, introducing an invariant that shows not all such diagrams are equivalent.
Contribution
It introduces an invariant for p-diagrams of surface links and provides a counterexample demonstrating that not all equivalent diagrams are p-equivalent.
Findings
An invariant distinguishes p-diagrams of surface links.
Counterexample shows some equivalent surface links are not p-equivalent.
The study clarifies limitations of diagrammatic moves without triple points.
Abstract
The singularity set of a generic standard projection to the three space of a closed surface linked in four space, consists of at most three types: double points, triple points or branch points. We say that this generic projection image is p-diagram if it does not contain any triple point. Two p-diagrams of equivalent surface links are called p-equivalent if there exists a finite sequence of local moves, such that each of them is one of the four moves taken from the seven on the well known Roseman list, that connects only p-diagrams. It is natural to ask: are any of two p-diagrams of equivalent surface links always p-equivalent? We introduce an invariant of p-equivalent diagrams and an example of linked surfaces that answers our question negatively.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
