Steiner Transitive-Closure Spanners of d-Dimensional Posets

TL;DR

This paper investigates Steiner transitive-closure spanners of d-dimensional posets, establishing bounds on their size and providing efficient constructions, with implications for property reconstruction and access control hierarchies.

Contribution

It provides nearly tight bounds on the size of Steiner 2-TC-spanners for d-dimensional hypergrids and posets, and introduces efficient construction methods.

Findings

Lower bounds on Steiner 2-TC-spanner size for hypergrids.

Efficient construction algorithms for low-dimensional posets.

Lower bounds on Steiner k-TC-spanners for d-dimensional posets.

Abstract

Given a directed graph G and an integer k >= 1, a k-transitive-closure-spanner (k-TCspanner) of G is a directed graph H that has (1) the same transitive-closure as G and (2) diameter at most k. In some applications, the shortcut paths added to the graph in order to obtain small diameter can use Steiner vertices, that is, vertices not in the original graph G. The resulting spanner is called a Steiner transitive-closure spanner (Steiner TC-spanner). Motivated by applications to property reconstruction and access control hierarchies, we concentrate on Steiner TC-spanners of directed acyclic graphs or, equivalently, partially ordered sets. In these applications, the goal is to find a sparsest Steiner k-TC-spanner of a poset G for a given k and G. The focus of this paper is the relationship between the dimension of a poset and the size of its sparsest Steiner TCspanner. The dimension of a poset G is the smallest d such that G can be embedded into a d-dimensional directed hypergrid via an order-preserving embedding. We present a nearly tight lower bound on the size of Steiner 2-TC-spanners of d-dimensional directed hypergrids. It implies better lower bounds on the complexity of local reconstructors of monotone functions and functions with low Lipschitz constant. The proof of the lower bound constructs a dual solution to a linear programming relaxation of the Steiner 2-TC-spanner problem. We also show that one can efficiently construct a Steiner 2-TC-spanner, of size matching the lower bound, for any low-dimensional poset. Finally, we present a lower bound on the size of Steiner k-TC-spanners of d-dimensional posets that shows that the best-known construction, due to De Santis et al., cannot be improved significantly.