Dust Attenuation in UV-selected Starbursts at High Redshift and their Local Counterparts: Implications for the Cosmic Star Formation Rate Density
Roderik Overzier, Tim Heckman, Jing Wang, Lee Armus, Veronique Buat,, Justin Howell, Gerhardt Meurer, Mark Seibert, Brian Siana, Antara Basu-Zych,, St\'ephane Charlot, Thiago S. Gon\c{c}alves, D. Christopher Martin, James D., Neill, R. Michael Rich, Samir Salim

TL;DR
This study compares dust attenuation in local UV-selected starbursts and high-redshift galaxies, confirming that local calibrations reliably estimate star formation rates across cosmic time.
Contribution
It demonstrates that dust properties of local Lyman Break Analogs match high-redshift LBGs, validating local dust correction methods for distant galaxy star formation rate estimates.
Findings
Dust attenuation in local LBAs and high-redshift LBGs is very similar.
Local dust correction calibrations are reliable for high-redshift galaxy SFR estimates.
The study supports using local relations to estimate cosmic star formation rate density.
Abstract
We present a new analysis of the dust obscuration in starburst galaxies at low and high redshift. This study is motivated by our unique sample of the most extreme UV-selected starburst galaxies in the nearby universe (z<0.3), found to be good analogs of high-redshift Lyman Break Galaxies (LBGs) in most of their physical properties. We find that the dust properties of the Lyman Break Analogs (LBAs) are consistent with the relation derived previously by Meurer et al. (M99) that is commonly used to dust-correct star formation rate measurements at a very wide range of redshifts. We directly compare our results with high redshift samples (LBGs, BzK, and sub-mm galaxies at z=2-3) having IR data either from Spitzer or Herschel. The attenuation in typical LBGs at z=2-3 and LBAs is very similar. Because LBAs are much better analogs to LBGs compared to previous local star-forming samples,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
